Many investors use Value ETFs as a simple way to gain exposure to cheaper, more cyclical or more defensive equities.
The question has become more relevant after the 2025 inflection, when value strongly outperformed broader equity indices and the performance gap between value and growth became much harder to ignore.
But the label can hide important differences.
In our latest paper, we look at two Value ETFs, the iShares MSCI World Value Factor ETF (IWVL) and the Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor ETF (XDEV), and ask a straightforward question: do these products actually deliver traditional value exposure, or do they mainly select the cheaper stocks within each sector?
A sector-neutral Value ETF can still carry a large Technology allocation, even if it screens cheaper than growth peers on valuation metrics.
That matters for risk.
Investors may expect value exposure to be less sensitive to certain macro trends, such as rising discount rates or technology de-ratings. But sector-relative value does not remove sector exposure. A cheaper technology stock is still a technology stock.
At ELIA, we look beyond product labels and focus on methodology, holdings, sector structure and factor exposure before assigning a portfolio role.
Full paper below.
For Qualified Investors Only.